01 The Problem ——————

AutoZone.com had a deals experience.

AutoZone.com had a deals experience.

It lacked an updated deals strategy.

It lacked an updated deals strategy.

Millions of customers use AutoZone's mobile app every week. Yet, none of them had an intuitive way to find, understand, or activate a deal.
The surface problem was a fragmented UI. The real problem was deeper: customers didn't trust the deals, didn't understand what was included, and often didn't know they missed one until it was too late.

In a cost-sensitive DIY market where competitors were getting sharper, this wasn't a UX debt issue. It was a revenue and retention risk.
Millions of customers use AutoZone's mobile app every week. Yet, none of them had an intuitive way to find, understand, or activate a deal.
The surface problem was a fragmented UI. The real problem was deeper: customers didn't trust the deals, didn't understand what was included, and often didn't know they missed one until it was too late.

In a cost-sensitive DIY market where competitors were getting sharper, this wasn't a UX debt issue. It was a revenue and retention risk.

Previous Website deals drawer design

Previous Website deals drawer design

User Pain Points

Website deals entry point on Product Details Page

  • Most customers missed deals entirely
  • 12% of users recognized the deal badge as actionable
  • Vague deal language eroded trust at peak purchase intent
  • No savings experience on the mobile app (a channel used by millions
User Pain Points
User Pain Points

Website deals entry point on Product Details Page

Website deals entry point on Product Details Page

  • Most customers missed deals entirely
  • Most customers missed deals entirely
  • 12% of users recognized the deal badge as actionable
  • 12% of users recognized the deal badge as actionable
  • Vague deal language eroded trust at peak purchase intent
  • Vague deal language eroded trust at peak purchase intent
  • No savings experience on the mobile app (a channel used by millions
  • No savings experience on the mobile app (a channel used by millions
Business Challenges
Business Challenges
  • 0.4% conversion on web deals
  • Average Order Gap (AOV) gap:

    App ~$96 vs. Web ~$105, compounding weekly
  • Zero deal revenue infrastructure on mobile
  • Backend was outdated and deals verbiage could not be updated at this time preventing scalable patterns
  • 0.4% conversion on web deals
  • Average Order Gap (AOV) gap:

    App ~$96 vs. Web ~$105, compounding weekly
  • Zero deal revenue infrastructure on mobile
  • Backend was outdated and deals verbiage could not be updated at this time preventing scalable patterns
02 • Role & Ownership ——————
02 • Role & Ownership ——————

I owned this end-to-end —

I owned this end-to-end —

strategy, design, iterate, and ship.

strategy, design, iterate, and ship.

As the sole Senior Product Designer on the mobile app team, I had full ownership of the deals experience audit & redesign across both app and web. From problem framing to shipped product. I set design direction, adjusted to pivots that helped shape the roadmap, and drove alignment across product, engineering, research, and analytics.

I also established the UX patterns that became the foundation of AutoZone's design system going forward. This wasn't an execution role. I was embedded at the strategy level from day one.
As the sole Senior Product Designer on the mobile app team, I had full ownership of the deals experience audit & redesign across both app and web. From problem framing to shipped product. I set design direction, adjusted to pivots that helped shape the roadmap, and drove alignment across product, engineering, research, and analytics.

I also established the UX patterns that became the foundation of AutoZone's design system going forward. This wasn't an execution role. I was embedded at the strategy level from day one.

Based on our consumer segmentations, reluctant fixers & deal-driven researchers became our focus.

Based on our consumer segmentations, reluctant fixers & deal-driven researchers became our focus.

My cross-functi0nal strategy

My cross-functi0nal strategy

01 - Research & Synthesis
01 - Research & Synthesis
  • Defined research agenda with UXR, synthesized user problems, 2 years of data, and analytics into design strategy.
  • Defined research agenda with UXR, synthesized user problems, 2 years of data, and analytics into design strategy.
02- Information Architecture
02- Information Architecture
  • Mapped current vs. future-state flows. Flexible IA that supports multiple deal types.
  • Mapped current vs. future-state flows. Flexible IA that supports multiple deal types.
03 - Prototyping & Testing
03 - Prototyping & Testing
  • Mid- and hi-fi prototypes for usability testing. Co-developed testing strategy and success measures with UXR.
  • Mid- and hi-fi prototypes for usability testing. Co-developed testing strategy and success measures with UXR.
04 - HiFi Design System
  • Cross-platform designs aligned to global design system. New patterns became the standard across both platforms.
04 - HiFi Design System
  • Cross-platform designs aligned to global design system. New patterns became the standard across both platforms.
05 - Engineering Partnership
  • Weekly syncs throughout. Dev-ready MVP with annotated acceptance criteria. Technical limitations addressed.
05 - Engineering Partnership
  • Weekly syncs throughout. Dev-ready MVP with annotated acceptance criteria. Technical limitations addressed.
06 - Phase 2 Roadmap
06 - Phase 2 Roadmap
  • Scalable component framework with documented recommendations for future deal types beyond MVP.
  • Scalable component framework with documented recommendations for future deal types beyond MVP.
01 - Research & Synthesis
  • Defined research agenda with UXR, synthesized user problems, 2 years of data, and analytics into design strategy.
02- Information Architecture
  • Mapped current vs. future-state flows. Flexible IA that supports multiple deal types.
03 - Prototyping & Testing
  • Mid- and hi-fi prototypes for usability testing. Co-developed testing strategy and success measures with UXR.
04 - HiFi Design System
  • Cross-platform designs aligned to global design system. New patterns became the standard across both platforms.
05 - Engineering Partnership
  • Weekly syncs throughout. Dev-ready MVP with annotated acceptance criteria. Technical limitations addressed.
06 - Phase 2 Roadmap
  • Scalable component framework with documented recommendations for future deal types beyond MVP.
03 Research & Insights ——————
03 Research & Insights ——————

We didn't guess. We built a clear picture of exactly where

We didn't guess. We built a clear picture of exactly where

and why customers were failing.

and why customers were failing.

I defined the research agenda alongside UXR and treated every finding as a design requirement. Not a suggestion.

100-participant unmoderated usability study · 2 years of deals drawer engagement data · funnel analytics · competitive benchmarking (Home Depot, Lowe's, Amazon, Walmart) · Baymard frameworks on pricing transparency.
I defined the research agenda alongside UXR and treated every finding as a design requirement. Not a suggestion.

100-participant unmoderated usability study · 2 years of deals drawer engagement data · funnel analytics · competitive benchmarking (Home Depot, Lowe's, Amazon, Walmart) · Baymard frameworks on pricing transparency.
  1. Vague language breaks trust before the sale starts
  1. Vague language breaks trust before the sale starts
Terms like “Complete Job” led users to assume labor might be included.
Terms like “Complete Job” led users to assume labor might be included.
01 Design Decision ——————
01 Design Decision ——————
Use plain language that explicitly states what the bundle includes.
Use plain language that explicitly states what the bundle includes.
  1. The #1 friction point: users didn’t know how to apply a deal.
  1. The #1 friction point: users didn’t know how to apply a deal.
Many believed deals would auto‑apply or didn’t realize the badge was actionable.
Many believed deals would auto‑apply or didn’t realize the badge was actionable.
02 Design Decision ——————
02 Design Decision ——————
Three activation points across shelf, PDP, and cart. This single insight was the primary driver of the 6× conversion lift.
Three activation points across shelf, PDP, and cart. This single insight was the primary driver of the 6× conversion lift.
  1. Comprehension suffers when deal details are hidden or separated.
  1. Comprehension suffers when deal details are hidden or separated.
Separating the deal description, pricing breakdown, and CTA, even slightly caused measurable drops in task completion. Customers needed all three in immediate proximity to decide confidently.
Separating the deal description, pricing breakdown, and CTA, even slightly caused measurable drops in task completion. Customers needed all three in immediate proximity to decide confidently.
03 Design Decision ——————
03 Design Decision ——————
Bring deal description, pricing, and primary actions into tighter proximity with stronger visual hierarchy.
Bring deal description, pricing, and primary actions into tighter proximity with stronger visual hierarchy.
  1. Users were most influenced when deal value was spelled out early.
  1. Users were most influenced when deal value was spelled out early.
Users who saw savings amounts, item inclusions, and pricing context before interacting made faster, more confident decisions. Those who had to search for it hesitated or left.
Users who saw savings amounts, item inclusions, and pricing context before interacting made faster, more confident decisions. Those who had to search for it hesitated or left.
04 Design Decision ——————
04 Design Decision ——————
Highlight savings, compared value, and included items upfront.
Highlight savings, compared value, and included items upfront.
04 • Role & Ownership ——————
04 • Role & Ownership ——————

Before design, alignment.

Before design, alignment.

Four principles to guide four teams.

Four principles to guide four teams.

Cross-functional work at this scale fails when teams optimize locally. I established four design principles early — not as guardrails, but as a shared decision-making language. When tradeoffs came up, these gave us a way to resolve them without compromising the strategy.
Cross-functional work at this scale fails when teams optimize locally. I established four design principles early — not as guardrails, but as a shared decision-making language. When tradeoffs came up, these gave us a way to resolve them without compromising the strategy.
  1. Simple, transparent, and rewarding
  1. Simple, transparent, and rewarding
Every touchpoint should reduce uncertainty. If a customer wonders what's included or whether the deal is worth it, the design has failed. The goal is for our customers to feel rewarded for adding deals.
Every touchpoint should reduce uncertainty. If a customer wonders what's included or whether the deal is worth it, the design has failed. The goal is for our customers to feel rewarded for adding deals.
  1. Design reduces cognitive load
  1. Design reduces cognitive load
Customers shouldn't do mental math to understand a bundle. The design does the comparison work for them, surfacing the right information in the right order so the decision feels obvious, not effortful.
Customers shouldn't do mental math to understand a bundle. The design does the comparison work for them, surfacing the right information in the right order so the decision feels obvious, not effortful.
  1. One mental model, two platforms
  1. One mental model, two platforms
The same customer shops on both app and web. If the experience feels different — different terminology, different flows — trust is lost. Cross-platform consistency isn't a nice-to-have. It's a must.
The same customer shops on both app and web. If the experience feels different — different terminology, different flows — trust is lost. Cross-platform consistency isn't a nice-to-have. It's a must.
  1. Architecture built for what's next
  1. Architecture built for what's next
Every pattern we shipped had to support deal types we hadn't designed yet. A scalable architecture isn't just more efficient, it's a business asset. We built it that way from day one.
Every pattern we shipped had to support deal types we hadn't designed yet. A scalable architecture isn't just more efficient, it's a business asset. We built it that way from day one.
05 Design Process ——————

Five phases.

Five phases.

One decision that changed the outcome.

One decision that changed the outcome.

01
01
01
Discovery & Alignment
Discovery & Alignment
Discovery & Alignment
Cross-functional workshop before any pixels. Audited both platforms, documented UX debt, built a shared opportunity map.
Cross-functional workshop before any pixels. Audited both platforms, documented UX debt, built a shared opportunity map.
Cross-functional workshop before any pixels. Audited both platforms, documented UX debt, built a shared opportunity map.
02
02
02
IA & User Flows
IA & User Flows
IA & User Flows
Current vs. future-state flows. Flexible IA for bundles, volume discounts, and promotions — without a redesign each time.
Current vs. future-state flows. Flexible IA for bundles, volume discounts, and promotions — without a redesign each time.
Current vs. future-state flows. Flexible IA for bundles, volume discounts, and promotions — without a redesign each time.
03
03
03
Explorationnn
Explorationnn
Explorationnn
Multiple directions. Card hierarchies, badge affordance, detail page layouts. Chose for comprehension — not aesthetics.
Multiple directions. Card hierarchies, badge affordance, detail page layouts. Chose for comprehension — not aesthetics.
Multiple directions. Card hierarchies, badge affordance, detail page layouts. Chose for comprehension — not aesthetics.
04
04
04
Prototype & Test
Prototype & Test
Prototype & Test
100-participant study. Findings defined the design — activation model, hierarchy, language. Not suggestions. Requirements.
100-participant study. Findings defined the design — activation model, hierarchy, language. Not suggestions. Requirements.
100-participant study. Findings defined the design — activation model, hierarchy, language. Not suggestions. Requirements.
05
05
05
Dev
Delivery
Dev
Delivery
Dev
Delivery
Weekly engineering syncs from the start. Dev-ready specs with annotated acceptance criteria. Minimal ambiguity at handoff.
Weekly engineering syncs from the start. Dev-ready specs with annotated acceptance criteria. Minimal ambiguity at handoff.
Weekly engineering syncs from the start. Dev-ready specs with annotated acceptance criteria. Minimal ambiguity at handoff.
06 • The Solution ——————
06 • The Solution ——————

A deals system built to be found,

A deals system built to be found,

understood, and trusted — everywhere.

understood, and trusted — everywhere.

The output wasn't a redesigned screen. It was a unified deal ecosystem: shared mental model, scalable components, and consistent experience across the shelf page, PDP, deals flow, cart, and checkout — on both app and web.
The output wasn't a redesigned screen. It was a unified deal ecosystem: shared mental model, scalable components, and consistent experience across the shelf page, PDP, deals flow, cart, and checkout — on both app and web.
  1. Deals Entry Points

A unified entry point and updated badging on mobile and web with:

  • Clear categorization

  • Higher visibility for top‑performing bundles

  • UI that resembles coupon cut out, clear to users that it is clickable and in proximity to price

Before (App)
After (App)
Before (Web)
After (Web)
  1. Deals Entry Points

A unified entry point and updated badging on mobile and web with:

  • Clear categorization

  • Higher visibility for top‑performing bundles

  • UI that resembles coupon cut out, clear to users that it is clickable and in proximity to price

Before (App)
After (App)
Before (Web)
After (Web)
  1. Deals Entry Points

A unified entry point and updated badging on mobile and web with:

  • Clear categorization

  • Higher visibility for top‑performing bundles

  • UI that resembles coupon cut out, clear to users that it is clickable and in proximity to price

Before (App)
After (App)
Before (Web)
After (Web)
2. Decision to Remove Fulfillment Step

Users often browse Deals tab to plan for future shopping (UXR Dscout deals survey insights)

  • Removing selecting fulfillment type (pick up in store vs. delivery) at this step provides users with more product options and removes fulfillment dead ends & user frustration as seen below

Before (Web)
2. Decision to Remove Fulfillment Step

Users often browse Deals tab to plan for future shopping (UXR Dscout deals survey insights)

  • Removing selecting fulfillment type (pick up in store vs. delivery) at this step provides users with more product options and removes fulfillment dead ends & user frustration as seen below

Before (Web)
2. Decision to Remove Fulfillment Step

Users often browse Deals tab to plan for future shopping (UXR Dscout deals survey insights)

  • Removing selecting fulfillment type (pick up in store vs. delivery) at this step provides users with more product options and removes fulfillment dead ends & user frustration as seen below

Before (Web)
  1. Deal Drawer

Redesigned for user comprehension:

  • Images were redundant - updated to only show at the top of the page

  • Price comparison of single unit vs. deal package was updated

  • Verbiage streamlined as much as possible with backend limitations - avoid redundancy

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Deal Drawer

Redesigned for user comprehension:

  • Images were redundant - updated to only show at the top of the page

  • Price comparison of single unit vs. deal package was updated

  • Verbiage streamlined as much as possible with backend limitations - avoid redundancy

Before (Web)
After (App)
2. Decision to Remove Fulfillment Step

Users often browse Deals tab to plan for future shopping (UXR Dscout deals survey insights)

  • Removing selecting fulfillment type (pick up in store vs. delivery) at this step provides users with more product options and removes fulfillment dead ends & user frustration as seen below

Before (Web)
  1. Review Deal

Redesigned for clarity and comprehension:

  • Plain‑language descriptions

  • Detailed breakdown of included items

  • Clear savings + comparison pricing

  • Consistent component structure for future bundles

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Review Deal

Redesigned for clarity and comprehension:

  • Plain‑language descriptions

  • Detailed breakdown of included items

  • Clear savings + comparison pricing

  • Consistent component structure for future bundles

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Deal Drawer

Redesigned for user comprehension:

  • Images were redundant - updated to only show at the top of the page

  • Price comparison of single unit vs. deal package was updated

  • Verbiage streamlined as much as possible with backend limitations - avoid redundancy

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Review Deal

Redesigned for clarity and comprehension:

  • Plain‑language descriptions

  • Detailed breakdown of included items

  • Clear savings + comparison pricing

  • Consistent component structure for future bundles

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Swapping Items in Deal

Redesigned for user comprehension:

  • "Current item" is kept at the top of the page to aid users in comparing and contrasting swapped item

  • Part number included - UXR insights showed that users shopping in store heavily rely on part numbers to find the right products that fit their vehicle (thus lowering returns / user frustration)

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Swapping Items in Deal

Redesigned for user comprehension:

  • "Current item" is kept at the top of the page to aid users in comparing and contrasting swapped item

  • Part number included - UXR insights showed that users shopping in store heavily rely on part numbers to find the right products that fit their vehicle (thus lowering returns / user frustration)

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Swapping Items in Deal

Redesigned for user comprehension:

  • "Current item" is kept at the top of the page to aid users in comparing and contrasting swapped item

  • Part number included - UXR insights showed that users shopping in store heavily rely on part numbers to find the right products that fit their vehicle (thus lowering returns / user frustration)

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Adding Deal to Cart (Mini-Cart)

Guided, intuitive activation:

  • Added to cart clarity and improved information hierarchy

  • Deal details, images, and final price is clearly outlined

  • Best practice to not add product recommendations at this step - goal is to ensure user understands deal value

  • User can go to cart or continue shopping

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Adding Deal to Cart (Mini-Cart)

Guided, intuitive activation:

  • Added to cart clarity and improved information hierarchy

  • Deal details, images, and final price is clearly outlined

  • Best practice to not add product recommendations at this step - goal is to ensure user understands deal value

  • User can go to cart or continue shopping

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Adding Deal to Cart (Mini-Cart)

Guided, intuitive activation:

  • Added to cart clarity and improved information hierarchy

  • Deal details, images, and final price is clearly outlined

  • Best practice to not add product recommendations at this step - goal is to ensure user understands deal value

  • User can go to cart or continue shopping

Before (Web)
After (App)
  1. Cross‑Platform Alignment

Web + mobile now share the same mental model

  • Scalable components support new deal formats

  • Updates made to various pages & flows:

    • Shelf Page, Product Description Page, Deals Flow, Cart & Checkout

  1. Cross‑Platform Alignment

Web + mobile now share the same mental model

  • Scalable components support new deal formats

  • Updates made to various pages & flows:

    • Shelf Page, Product Description Page, Deals Flow, Cart & Checkout

  1. Cross‑Platform Alignment

Web + mobile now share the same mental model

  • Scalable components support new deal formats

  • Updates made to various pages & flows:

    • Shelf Page, Product Description Page, Deals Flow, Cart & Checkout

Post Redesign Usability Insights

  • Users were now able to easily find the deals badging as it was in proximity with price and fulfillment selectors


  • The UI was easy to find and 98% of users found it within 2 seconds


  • Success rate 13/18 participants


  • Cart - Only 4 out of 18 users were able to successfully correct their error state and proceed with checkout​


  • When trying to identify what’s contained in their deal, users often struggled to understand the language used to describe the deal on the first page of the flyout​

  • Users were now able to easily find the deals badging as it was in proximity with price and fulfillment selectors


  • The UI was easy to find and 98% of users found it within 2 seconds


  • Success rate 13/18 participants


  • Cart - Only 4 out of 18 users were able to successfully correct their error state and proceed with checkout​


  • When trying to identify what’s contained in their deal, users often struggled to understand the language used to describe the deal on the first page of the flyout​

Heat Maps show that users found deals badging post redesign with ease

Heat Maps show that users found deals badging post redesign with ease

07 Impact & Results ——————
07 Impact & Results ——————

This wasn't a UX improvement.

This wasn't a UX improvement.

It was a business transformation.

It was a business transformation.

+13 Million
+13 Million
+13 Million
first year renevenue
first year renevenue
first year renevenue
6X
6X
6X
Conversion lift
Conversion lift
Conversion lift
+14%
+14%
+14%
YoY app sales
YoY app sales
YoY app sales
+3.4%
+3.4%
+3.4%
average order value (AOV)
average order value (AOV)
average order value (AOV)
08 • Reflection ——————
08 • Reflection ——————

What I learned leading this

What I learned leading this

at the senior level.

at the senior level.

The hardest parts weren't visual. They were organizational. Aligning fragmented teams, holding a tradeoff decision under real pressure, and designing a system flexible enough for a business that was still figuring out what it wanted from deals.
The hardest parts weren't visual. They were organizational. Aligning fragmented teams, holding a tradeoff decision under real pressure, and designing a system flexible enough for a business that was still figuring out what it wanted from deals.

Technical limitations outside

Technical limitations outside

of our control

of our control

  • Not every decision shipped as designed. Backend limitations influenced the savings banner, and eCommerce pod constraints shaped the cart badge, both intentionally deferred to Phase 2 to protect the launch window.
  • The endpoint supporting final price with savings couldn't be surfaced at the add-to-cart confirmation stage. Users could only view their savings once inside the cart.


  • Deal messaging optimization remains a known opportunity, pending a backend update to simplify and clarify verbiage for end users.

  • Our deals system runs on a legacy merchandising platform that limits how deal content, pricing, and inclusions can be input, updated, and displayed. Unfortunately creating friction between what we design and what can actually ship. (See image below for reference)

  • Not every decision shipped as designed. Backend limitations influenced the savings banner, and eCommerce pod constraints shaped the cart badge, both intentionally deferred to Phase 2 to protect the launch window.


  • The endpoint supporting final price with savings couldn't be surfaced at the add-to-cart confirmation stage. Users could only view their savings once inside the cart.


  • Deal messaging optimization remains a known opportunity, pending a backend update to simplify and clarify verbiage for end users.

  • Our deals system runs on a legacy merchandising platform that limits how deal content, pricing, and inclusions can be input, updated, and displayed. Unfortunately creating friction between what we design and what can actually ship. (See image below for reference)

01 - Strategic ownership
01 - Strategic ownership
Collaborated with product to determine the problem. I brought a point of view, pressure-tested it with research, and aligned the team around it. The design was better because the strategy was clear — and the strategy was clear because I treated it as part of my process.
Collaborated with product to determine the problem. I brought a point of view, pressure-tested it with research, and aligned the team around it. The design was better because the strategy was clear — and the strategy was clear because I treated it as part of my process.
02 - Cross-functional influence without authority
02 - Cross-functional influence without authority
Aligning product, engineering, research, analytics, and marketing — with competing priorities — required communicating with precision and advocating with evidence. Design decisions landed because they were grounded in data and framed in business terms.
Aligning product, engineering, research, analytics, and marketing — with competing priorities — required communicating with precision and advocating with evidence. Design decisions landed because they were grounded in data and framed in business terms.
03 - Tradeoff judgement
03 - Tradeoff judgement
The phased launch wasn't the easy call. It required holding a position, absorbing pushback, and trusting the system design we'd built. Getting comfortable with "the right decision isn't always the complete decision" is a senior-level skill I sharpened here.
The phased launch wasn't the easy call. It required holding a position, absorbing pushback, and trusting the system design we'd built. Getting comfortable with "the right decision isn't always the complete decision" is a senior-level skill I sharpened here.
04 - System thinking at scale
04 - System thinking at scale
Every pattern had to work for deals we hadn't designed yet. That meant designing with constraints in mind. What's the most flexible version that doesn't sacrifice clarity? I got better at holding that tension throughout this project.
Every pattern had to work for deals we hadn't designed yet. That meant designing with constraints in mind. What's the most flexible version that doesn't sacrifice clarity? I got better at holding that tension throughout this project.

What I would do next:

  • Address Phase 2 technical debt on the savings banner, cart badge, and deals system in close collaboration with engineering.


  • Resist the urge to over-design. What shipped is working. The next phase is about targeted improvements, not a redesign.

  • Let the data lead. Dig into post-launch analytics to identify where users drop off, hesitate, or succeed, and let that shape priorities.

"Great design and great product outcomes are the same thing when you focus on solving the right problem — not just producing outputs."